|
New
Questions on GMAT
One of the new question types in GMAT CAT is the bolded
question in Critical Reasoning Section. In such argument, one or two sentences
in stimulus are bolded. A sample question looks like this.
Something must be
done to stop spam. In early days, people seldom
received unsolicited email advertisement; but now that numerous bulk
email software and email address finders are developed to collect email address
all around the world. Advertisers use email addresses to market their products
and even sell such email lists to other advertisers. As a result, almost
everyone ever get junk email, and sometime several and even tens of annoying
emails a day. So, relevant anti-spam regulations should be framed to stop
unsolicited advertising.
The two portions
in boldface play which of the following roles?
A. Background
that the argument depends on and conclusion that can be drawn from the argument.
B. Part of
evidence that the argument includes, and inference that can be drawn from this
passage.
C. Pre-evidence
that the argument depends on and part of evidence that supports the conclusion.
D. Background
that argument depends on and part of evidence that supports the conclusion.
E. Pre-evidence
that argument includes and a method that helps to supports that conclusion.
The
question following requires you to identify the logical relationship between the
boldfaced sentences, or how it relates to a particular position (the author
agrees or disagrees).
Boldface
question is totally new on computer-based test, but is easy to tackle. All you
have to do is to understand the argument: identify the conclusion, evidence, and
the reasoning from evidence to conclusion. Sometime, you are required to
critique the validity of the argument.
How to
approach
Boldface
Question
1.
Identify the conclusion. Ask yourself what the conclusion is, what the author
is
trying to prove, or what the author’s main point is.
2.
Look for the evidence that the author uses to support or argue against a
position.
3. Search
for argument indicator to determine the relationship between
evidence and conclusion.
Conclusion
Indicators
|
so |
thus |
therefore |
as a result |
|
consequently |
accordingly |
hence |
imply |
|
conclude that |
follows that |
means that |
infer that |
Premise Indicators
|
because |
since |
for |
as |
|
if |
assume |
suppose |
evidence |
|
on the basis of |
the reason is that |
may be derived from |
in that |
Counter-evidence
Indicators
|
actually |
despite |
admittedly |
except |
|
even though |
nonetheless |
nevertheless |
although |
|
however |
In spite of |
do |
may |
4. Before you pick up the answer choices, make sure you did NOT mistake
counter-evidence as evidence. |